![]() ![]() You should see a distinct difference in actual feedrate. This takes the guess-work out of creating high quality models. Use an ARC PP (provided the controller supports arc movement). Aspires unique 3D modeling tools coupled with the comprehensive set of 2D design and. Try a similar pocket toolpath but this time with a true circle instead of an ellipse. This will appear as if is exceeding the set IPM but only in comparison to the oval cut. Then when it gets to the step-over move, which will be much longer than the short segments, the machine will get much closer to the set IPM during that longer move. ![]() ![]() The software can import 2D designs from other programs but also provides a full set of drawing and editing tools. So short that the finished cut will look nice and smooth.ĭepending on how good the Constant Velocity is on your controller and how high the acceleration is set on your machine, as it moves around these short segments it will never achieve anything like the set IPM. If you need to to create projects bigger than 24' x 24 please look into this other solutions from Vectric: VCarve Pro / Aspire. The oval shape will be made up of many short straight segments. Set the rapid rate to something you desire, in my case its set to 2000mm/min. It was an oval shape.Īs the path spiraled out, I noticed that each step from the inside to the outside on the step over (which was set at 27%) was a very rapid jerk that seemed to greatly exceed the selected IPM rate. Vectric PhotoVcarve is a great piece of software to turns your photographs. Glug wrote:I was cutting a part last night with a pocket tool path, using the default values. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |